It’s not a fun topic to talk about, mostly because the basics of this kind of insurance is not about life, but death. We generally don’t want to talk about our own mortality, much less plan for the eventual inevitable.
Life insurance is a much more difficult topic to think about than it is to actually talk about.
Because of the difficulty of this subject, many companies have started utilizing the multi-level-marketing (MLM) format which emphasizes selling to people you know.
The problem with the MLM format
There are five main downfalls we have found with the multi-level-marketing format of life insurance.
- Agent dedication
- Marketing efforts
- Product direction
- Effective servicing
- Recruiting model
Before we get into these problems, let’s define a MLM organization and an agent.
Multi-Level-Marketing organizations are companies with a group of offerings that focus on both product sales and recruiting. Rather than being a service and sales oriented company, they focus on selling a business model to prospects. For instance, World Financial Group (WFG), is a multi-level marketing company that offers various life insurance products. Their agents are taught life insurance basics, what anyone needs to learn to get licensed, and then are trained to recruit prospects to join their downline.
The downline is simply people an agent has recruited to work under them. Conversely, the upline is the people who recruited the agent.
Whether MLMs are legitimate businesses is a debate for a different website, as we here at Bow Tie Financial Group are all about insurance, not the nuances of what constitutes an “actual” business.
Most MLMs in the life insurance realm have a partnership with a few companies. WFG, for instance, has special contracts with Transamerica, Pacific Life, and a few others. People Helping People (PHP) has a special contract with AIG and, I’m certain, a few other carriers. Primerica has partnerships with Metlife, Franklin Templeton Investments, Lincoln Financial, and others.
You might be aware of a few other multi-level marketing organizations out there, such as World Ventures, Mary Kay, Amway, Avon, Jamberry, LegalShield, Herbalife, and innumerable others. There’s even a magazine periodical dedicated solely to the development of MLM participants.
All of these promise full-time income potential with part-time effort.
It’s time to dive into why, in our opinion, MLM life insurance companies are best to be avoided as life insurance consultants.
1. Agent Dedication
Agent dedication is critical. What do we mean by agent dedication, though?
We mean an agent whose primary focus in business is insurance. Who is solely focused on learning the policy types, differences between products, how each company operates differently, and wonky insurance nuances most people aren’t even aware of.
What else? Agents should be dedicated to their clients and to their carriers. Obviously their clients need to be properly protected. The carriers all have a demographic they best fit, usually represented by rate. Pairing the two up is really the thrust of the agent’s job.
Dedication also comes into play with longevity. If you have insurance questions about a universal life policy, or what some options are with a whole life policy after a few years of cash accumulation, you’ll need an agent who has been with you since it was the setup.
Speaking of setup, we need to make sure your agent is setting up your cash-value life insurance policy with your best interests, not maximizing their commission. Other than cash value, do you need a child rider, return of premium rider, or maybe a waiver of premium rider on your term policy? Do you even know what they are or what they do? These are all things full time agents know which many MLM agents don’t even have on their radar.
2. Marketing Efforts
This is a complicated part of this writing. Marketing is probably the most critical part of the prospecting and sales process, other than making sure things are written correctly.
MLM companies market to three distinct groups of people, on behalf of two entities. They market to
- Current representatives on behalf of themselves
- Current representatives on behalf of their specially contracted carriers
- Prospective representatives on behalf of themselves
- Specially contracted carriers on behalf of themselves
Agents have one job: marketing to prospects and clients.
What happens when you have a MLM company bringing agents to their annual convention, where their top one or two carriers talk about how great they are and how, without them, the MLM all these people “work for” would not exist? What happens when agents, who by their licensing, are in a position of authority, are lead to believe they’re superior to people with a job (which is often spoken derogatorily as a ‘j-o-b’) because they’re “owning their own business”?
Agents have, in our opinion, one job: match our clients up with the best program for their needs. The only thing we are superior in is our knowledge of insurance product, not business, life, or how to live.
Multi-level marketing organizations have an insular culture of us-first, largely because of their marketing. This results in an often cultist organization where people first represent the MLM company rather than the interests of their clients. Sure, they touch on the best interests of prospects, it just comes as one of the tools for the organization’s strategy rather than the root of the agent’s process.
So, to answer our first question, what happens when they bring agents to their convention and their agents buy into the idea of independence built upon the back of this organization? People are given options that are limited, at best, and duped into joining an organization that will suck them dry, at worst.
Agents are dedicated to marketing to new prospects to consult with them. That’s the daily marketing effort of the independent agent. We don’t want to recruit or sell a dream of owning your own business — we just want to set you up with an insurance program that benefits you.
3. Product Direction
Product direction is not a term the insurance industry uses. In fact, it’s a term we made up to describe the focus of how agencies position their products. It ties closely in with marketing efforts, though it slightly different.
A life insurance product is intimate. It is often the one barrier between your family’s success and destitution in the event of a death. It can be a cushion that lets you take time off for grieving and therapy after losing a child or loved one. It can save an entire matriarch’s legacy from ruin.
Life insurance is often the one protection between destitution and success
The one direction product for full-time life insurance agents is toward clients. It’s finding the blend of term, cash value, and long term care. It’s figuring out whether juvenile life is best set up as a whole life to help fund college, or if it’s more advantageous to set it as part of the parents’ coverage.
Our one goal is to build a client for life, as it were.
Furthermore, product direction is based in experience. A direct agent will have a team of underwriters backing them to answer any questions they have. Many even long-time representatives with MLM organizations are still in a beginner level of knowledge with how to set people up properly.
Agents’ products are focused on client protection, growth, and development. We are experienced and backed by teams with an immense collective knowledge focused on selling the right product, not selling mass quantities of product.
4. Effective Servicing
Servicing applies to more than a missed payment or adjusting how much you put into your indexed life insurance policy. Servicing is anticipating your needs when you call in with a problem. It is a periodic review of what you currently have and suggestions on how to move forward.
Servicing is critical to insurance, especially life insurance. It comes from a desire to maintain good relationships and empower people to maintain knowledge and control over their assets and life. Servicing is one of the most powerful tools in an agent’s set.
Speaking from experience, servicing through a MLM representative’s perspective and from a direct agent’s perspective is wholly different. A representative with a MLM does not own their book of business. What that means is while they have access to it, it can be taken away at any time. A direct agent owns their book and is able to stay on top of any issues faster.
What that means, for you, is one less layer of red tape to cut through on the day before payday when you realize there’s a little more month left than there is check, and you need to adjust something. It means that direct agent is more likely to be able to pull you out of a sticky situation. It means that question you have about your unique underwriting case has fewer steps to get through for a solid answer.
It’s the difference between a policy being issued in days and one being issued in weeks. It’s often a 10% difference in premium, whether $18/month vs $20/month or $270/month vs $300/month. Oftentimes it even comes down to accuracy against speed.
Direct agents are more flexible and empowered to service their — our — clients. And we’re proud of it.
5. Recruiting Model
Most of this comes down to the recruiting model multi-level marketing organizations employ. In order to make recruiting attractive, there are weaknesses built into the representative’s business plans.
One of the largest problems is commission: a MLM representative’s commission is significantly lower and will still only go up to a fraction of a direct agent’s rate unless they can become among the top 5% of recruiters (recruiters is emphasized because amount and quality of sales don’t contribute to their commission).
We don’t work for free, of course, which is why we need commission. Our consultation to help you find, apply, and be accepted for the right insurance plan is our commission. It’s what keeps our lights on, our fridges stocked, and our tanks full. It feeds our pets, raises our children, and gives back to our community. The commission paid out on a policy is the same, whether it goes to a MLM or direct agent. It’s just your direct agent gets a higher commission because they’re empowered to service and work on your policy. The MLM organization absorbs 30-75% of the commission (usually on the higher end) to maintain their organization.
What this pay cut means is instead of being solely an insurance consultant and agent, MLM representatives have to recruit to survive and grow their business. This makes their friends, family, and insurance prospects potential downlines, to participate in these cut-rate commissions and recruiting models to train their own competition masked as teammates.
Direct agents only sell, service, and manage policies. We do not recruit.
As distasteful as we find the vast majority of multi-level marketing organizations, we don’t wish to discourage people from joining them should they find a fit. Much like food, we can’t fault people for enjoying what they do. I, Eddie, the author of this post and president of Bow Tie Financial Group, cannot stand eggplant, yet I don’t think people should never eat it if it suits them.
This is more a warning, a tip, something to encourage people to take a second look at the organization they’re purchasing something so, so critical from.
Direct agents are local business owners with full stakes in their business. We are people who dedicate ourselves to knowing what you don’t know, and what you don’t want to know. We ask ourselves each day “What do I know? What do they need to know? Have I told them it yet?”
Keep it local, keep it in your community, and keep it in your best interest. Go direct.
Click here for a quote
Chanukah and Kwanzaa are two beautiful holidays. Both are about celebrating the roots of one’s heritage and finding the line between assimilation into the majority and cultural independence. Both are celebrated by candles. Both are celebrated with family.
Candles and family can be hazardous, though. Here are some safety tips for these two holidays. Some tips will be for candles, other will be for the traditionally fried foods of Chanukah, finally, one will be some general heat and burn tips.
Whether you’re lighting a hanukiah (Chanukah menorah) or a kinara (the Kwanzaa candelabrum), you are literally bringing open flames into your house. Open flames, as we all know, can be incredibly dangerous. These are some basic safety guidelines
- Place your hanukiah or kinara on a flat, fire resistant surface. Stoneware is good, as is a metal tray or even
aluminum foil over a counter.
- Be aware of your surroundings: make sure your candles are not under curtains or drapes, are clear of flammable objects, and that they aren’t in an area where they can easily be knocked over.
- Never leave lit candles unattended — there are religious exceptions to extinguish flames for safety if you need to leave.
- Keep pets away from lit candles.
- Only allow children near candles with supervision, such as during lighting and prayers.
- In some cases, electric candles are a viable alternative. Make sure there are no frayed wires.
- Do not walk around with lit candles.
- Only place candles in the non-flammable hanukia or kinara, don’t use improvised materials.
- Be careful of hot wax.
Food (and Frying) Safety
Chanukah’s candles represent the time oil for one day lasted an entire eight — the time required to press more oil from olives in ancient times. As such, many traditional foods such as latkes and sufganiyot (potato pancakes and jelly filled doughnuts) are specifically made because of their connection to the oil.
Here are some basic tips to keep safe and injury free
- Be careful when grating or chopping by hand.
- Keep onions (and garlic) away from pets.
- Be mindful of long sleeves and hanging clothes when near oil or reaching across it.
- Use long-handled spatulas and spoons when preparing food
- In case of an oil fire, turn off the heat and cover with a lid. Do not use water on an oil fire!
- Use a splatter guard and oven mitts to protect from small oil burns.
General heat and burn safety
This brings us to the final part of our article, and the one its writer, Eddie, knows most about. He’s had his share of burns from his fire dancing days, though nothing too severe. He did work as safety for a couple “incidents” though. Luckily they all turned out fine, in no small part to him, so pay attention!
- Move an injured person away from any flames or heat sources.
- Smother any fires that occur on clothing, either with a towel or by rolling on the ground.
- Do not pull off clothing that has stuck to injured skin. Many synthetic fabrics will melt when burn. If the skin under has been compromised with a severe burn and the clothing is stuck to it, just cut the clothing around the injured area then seek treatment.
- Rinse any burns in tepid or lukewarm water for a few minutes. Do not use ice, cold water, or any ointments, creams, or lotions.
- Check the batteries of your smoke detector.
- Make sure you have an AB or ABC fire extinguisher available. We recommend keeping one outside the kitchen, as flames from cooking can prevent you from reaching it if kept in the kitchen.
Be safe, everyone. This is a wonderful time of the year to celebrate with family, friends, and loved ones. Whether you’re celebrating the cultural backbone of your African roots or the victories over societies that would have you change, do it with the kind of joy that you deserve.
We at the Bow Tie Financial Group wish you the deepest blessings for your holidays.
Christmas is a beautiful time of year. Lights sparkle in most every neighborhood, familiar music plays everywhere, and families come together.
Did you know that Christmas also presents unique risks to your family?
Tree fires are one of those unique risks. When setting up your Christmas tree, please consider the following tips:
- Ensure plugs are fully in their sockets and wires are in good condition.
- Make sure to water your tree: a dry tree can go from a small flame to an inferno within 60 seconds.
- Keep any heat source away from your tree (this includes candles).
- Use only UL or ETL/ITSNA listed lights.
- Use no more than 3 strands of lights per extension cord. Run those cords along the wall to avoid tripping on them; don’t run extension cords under rugs.
- Using an artificial tree? Make sure it’s non-flammable (not “inflammable“) and UL listed.
- Don’t decorate with tinsel if you have dogs or cats. Tinsel may be beautiful, but its shimmering nature is irresistible to our furry wards; they’re likely to eat the tinsel or pull the tree down in an attempt to get at it.
- “Angel hair,” made from spun glass, can irritate your eyes and skin; always wear gloves or substitute non-flammable cotton.
- Spraying artificial snow can irritate your lungs if inhaled; follow directions carefully.
- Decorate the tree with your kids in mind; move ornaments that are breakable or have metal hooks toward the top.
Christmas tree fires are fairly rare, but when they do happen, they’re absolutely devastating. Click this link from FEMA for more information on Winter fire safety.
Click this link from the Christmas Tree Association for a number of tips on how to protect your pets and many other things.
Click this link (opens in a new window) for a bunch of great safety information from the National Safety Council on how to prevent some of the over 15,000 injuries that happen during decorating every year.
Click this link for pet safety tips from the ASPCA.
Finally, in case something terrible and tragic does happen, make sure your family is covered. Call us today: (520) 867-4705 or get a quote here.
Up next: how to safely host a holiday dinner!
Happy holidays from all of us here at the Bow Tie Financial Group. Celebrate to the fullest and be safe!
The 2016 election cycle has been unique in almost every way. The presidency of Barack Obama has been fraught with unprecedented division with GOP leaders openly admitting that they preempted good ideas simply because endorsing it would mean their opposition had put through good legislation (Source 1, Source 2).
This, in our opinion, has hindered our country. From not allowing a Supreme Court nominee to be appointed, which has lead to many landmark cases being dismissed, to multiple government shutdowns, and even a law being passed which may allow people in other countries to sue the US government (Source). There is no excuse for this unprecedented gridlock, hatred, and division.
Much of this division goes well beyond a disagreement in policies. I, as a minority, have witnessed firsthand similar effects in my life: when all other things were equal, I have received extra scrutiny, obstruction, and even condescension for ideas I have presented. I have had ideas taken from me without credit at a higher rate than non-minority counterparts.
This is not a post about minority rights or endemic racism. These few paragraphs are here to establish some context.
To put it simply, Bow Tie Financial Group’s endorsement for the 2016 presidential election is Hillary Clinton.
This is not a begrudging endorsement nor is it a defeated one, akin to selecting the lesser of two evils. This is an enthusiastic, no holds barred, standing ovation endorsement.
This is an enthusiastic, no holds barred, standing ovation endorsement.
This post will lay out our endorsement in three sections:
- Why Clinton
- Why not Trump
- Why not Third Party?
Hillary Clinton has an incredible track record spanning decades. She has shown herself to be open to new information, dogged in her pursuits of passion, and an incredible listener to both allies and opponents.
Clinton is renowned in the political sphere for listening to people. Tom Harkin, Iowa senator from 1985-2015 said, “With Hillary, you’re in a meeting with her, and she really listens to you.” Ezra Klein, writer for Vox, laid out in extraordinary depth, how Hillary Clinton flies under the radar by quietly listening rather than boasting in his piece here.
Secretary Clinton is known for taking notes on conversations about peoples hopes, problems, and worries and sorting through them every couple months to get a bearing on what people need. She actually takes notes on what people say are plaguing them and does what she can to act on it.
This has been how she came to the conclusion the fight against opiate addiction needed more funding, that specific parts of veteran’s affairs needed changing, and any number of other policies.
In addition to listening to citizens she also listens to scientists.
Climate change is an incredibly real, incredibly dangerous foe to the human race. It has lead to more extreme weather events in the past few years than we have ever seen before. It is so real that insurance companies have acknowledged the change and are rating future projections with the effects of climate change factored into them. These are not inexpensive projections, either.
Wildfire risks are worse, hurricane and tornado risks are worse, and crop and livestock yields are threatened.
There is a 97% consensus by scientists that climate change is caused by humans (Source: NASA). Every argument against this staggering number of experts is based either on religious texts (which for our representatives to hold over science violates the First Amendment), on ignorance (which for our representatives to not listen to experts is inexcusable), or on lobbyist request (which is dangerous).
Hillary Clinton has not shied away from climate change. Yes, she has to deal with many issues brought about by massive energy conglomerates and their lobbyists. With that said, she has incredible plans to shift the US to clean energy, mostly solar and wind.
Donald Trump has claimed Clinton’s clean energy initiatives would cost the US $5 trillion, which is patently false (Source: PolitiFact).
On the economy: even a major Forbes.com contributor has extolled the effects of the Obama economy despite incredible media bias against it. We, as a country, have not only recovered from the ravaging our financial markets took from 2007-2009, we have recovered more than we lost. (Source: Forbes)
From that article (bolding is ours):
Obama’s administration has recovered all losses from the Bush crash, and gained more. Looking back further, we can see this is a common pattern. All six of the major market crashes happened under Republicans – Hoover (1), Nixon (2), Reagan (1) and Bush (2). The worst crash ever was the 58% decline which happened in 17 months of 2007-2009, during the Bush administration. But we’ve had one of the longest bull market runs in presidential history under Obama. Consistency, stability and predictability have been recent Democratic administration hallmarks, keeping investors enthusiastic.
One other thing to note is that net job creation under President Obama has been 9.3 million with a gross of over 14 million (Source: CNN Money). Gross is over 14 million because that’s how many jobs his administration helped to create, yet only an effective gain of 9.3 million because of how many were lost in 2008. A Clinton presidency continuing this trend would be most beneficial for our country.
According to Oxford Economics, a Trump presidency would set the US back $5 trillion, while a Clinton presidency would continue to grow the economy 1.5-2.3% each year through 2021 (Source: CNBC)
Of course, we still have massive income inequality regardless of the jobs created. Clinton’s economic policies will work to address that, Trump’s will not.
Aside from those incredible reasons, there’s her record on foreign policy, crime, bipartisan work, equal pay, and many other things (Source: VoteSmart.org).
Manufactured Scandals: The Media Case Against Clinton’s Trustworthiness
In an incredible piece for the Huffington Post (link – warning, some NSFW language), Larry Womack lays out the incredible bias for Clinton which is based heavily on the fact she’s a woman. It should be clear to most women that had a man acted with the forwardness and business aptitude Secretary Clinton displays, he’d be labelled “powerful” and a “go-getter”.
Regarding Benghazi, there were more attacks and deaths during Bush’s terms than Obama’s (Source: PolitiFact) and that 100% of Republican congressmen voted to cut $300,000,000 (million) from the US Embassy Security budget (Source: floor transcripts via CNN).
The last committee (also, the 7th committee and the 12th investigation) to investigate these attacks on the US Embassy faulted the Obama administration, not Hillary Clinton (Source: CNN). This is simply a tired red herring to distract us from the many accomplishments of Secretary Clinton.
Speaking of red herrings, the email scandal showed that Clinton not only operated within the law of the time (Source: FactCheck), she was one of many politicians to use private email servers, including Condeleeza Rice, Colin Powell, and John Kerry (Source: The Guardian).
Finally, the Clinton Foundation. FactCheck shows that the vast majority, 88%, of their funds goes toward their programs, not overhead and salaries (link). This is competitive with most major charities. This article from FactCheck.org outlines all the good the Clinton Foundation performs and all the non-scandals they’re involved in.
Why Not Trump?
The reasons for “why not Trump” are incredibly vast. For the purposes of our agency, we’re going to cover only three reasons: economic indications, personal security, and civility.
Donald Trump touts an economic plan which he claims will create jobs, decrease the national debt, otherwise improve the economy (Source: his website). Every major economic analysis from independent companies say this is not the case. Moody’s determined it would “significantly” hurt the economy (Source: Politco) and the Tax Policy Center determined it would increase the federal debt by $7.2 trillion in the first decade alone, and $20.9 trillion by 2036 (Source: Tax Policy Center).
2036 is the time many of my clients should be finalizing their final steps to coast into retirement. That is not the time for our national debt to balloon out so largely.
Much of this section is about things which go unnoticed by many, though which affect an incredible amount of people.
We are a minority owned company with ancestry in Mexico, England, and Poland. It should go without saying that any bigotry, racism, or demagoguery must be completely and vehemently condemned. It should go without saying, yet it obviously doesn’t.
There isn’t much that hasn’t been said about Donald Trump’s rampant xenophobia (fear of the “other”), racism, and quickness to blame perceived problems on minorities. He called for a blanket ban on Muslim immigrants (Source: Washington Post). He called Mexican immigrants rapists who bring in drugs and crime, without even a cursory nod to documented or “legal” immigration (Source: Washington Post). He has made incredibly terrible remarks demonstrating his willingness to sexually harass women and demean their status in the workplace, whether working at a beauty pageant or otherwise (Sources: The Frisky, CNN, Daily Kos via CBS, US Weekly).
This list isn’t even touching on incomprehensible list of allegations of harassment against Mr. Trump.
Speaking to his racist tendencies (Partial list here) — we can’t even call them undertones because of their brashness — Donald Trump is quick to bemoan people due to their heritage. Whether it was claiming bias against a judge due to that judge’s Mexican heritage (despite him being born in the US) or his attacks against the parents of a Gold Star recipient because they are Muslim, he has shown himself eager to discount the beautiful diversity which makes this country great.
Not only has he outwardly spoken against minorities, he has been happy to cozy up to such figures like the former Grand Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan. Yes, the infamously disgusting white supremacist David Duke has endorsed Trump and Trump refuses to strongly disavow his endorsement. Every single statement he has made against the former leader of the KKK and current white supremacist has been lip service and obligation.
Even beyond that, almost every racist faction, whether they be Neo-Nazi, white nationalists, or any of their ilk, have endorsed Trump due to his policies (Source: Mother Jones).
As a Jew whose ancestors fled tyranny in Europe, the proposed ban on Muslims is more than unconstitutional: it is morally abhorrent.
As an American with proud multi-cultural heritage, the lack of strong condemnation against white supremacy and the oppression of minorities, including calling for unconstitutional and racially oppressive poll watching, is unfathomable.
As a human who wants to improve the world for my generation and the ones to follow, his lack of acceptance of climate change and his economic policy is unsustainable and misguided.
Why Not Third Party?
This is an incredibly difficult question to address. I have to break it down in two sections: third party policy and third party validity. That is, how do the third party platforms stack up and are they even electable?
There are two third party candidates running: Libertarian Party nominee Gary Johnson and Green Party nominee Dr. Jill Stein. Let’s begin.
Gary Johnson would seek to privatize prisons, get rid of the Federal Reserve, and views taxes as a means for competitors to fight each other. He views the IRS as an industry which wastes the time of its 100,000 employees. He has proposed a flat tax and a consumption tax, both of which have been shown to disproportionately affect lower income people.
Dr. Jill Stein seeks to get the US solely on clean, renewable energy by 2030, force Israel to stop defending themselves from missile attacks from neighboring Palestine, and…well…I can’t find any concrete plans from Dr. Jill Stein on her website. There are a lot of platitudes with no planning.
Are They Viable?
This brings us to the elephant in the room: is a vote for either of these third party candidates useful?
Some people believe that voting for a third party candidate will send a message to either party, that voting their conscience is more important than bringing about as much actionable change as possible.
Others believe voting for a third party is a “wasted vote”. That since their polling numbers are so incredibly low and they stand practically no statistical chance of election, their vote and voice will get lost in the sea of the majority.
I agree with both sides. On one hand it’s critical to feel you’ve done the right thing the best you can. I understand that. Being able to sleep at night feeling you did all you could is a luxury some people cannot afford. There is an inherent privilege in being able to do that, knowing that whatever happens, your general welfare will remain fairly stable.
On the other hand, in this historic election, with all the foibles of Donald Trump, a third party vote potentially helps give voice to the hate and demagoguery which has propelled him up. That hate and bigotry has already fueled anti-Semitism, violence against latinos, and violence against protesters and press.
Giving voice to those actions is a complicit and silent endorsement of those actions. With two electable candidates, one of who seeks out the rights of all and one who is happy to let those rights fall away, one must weigh pure conscience with practicality.
For those reasons I, and my agency Bow Tie Financial Group, cannot endorse any votes for a third party candidate.
Throughout my career I’ve encountered people who weren’t licensed in insurance peddling fake health insurance policies. They said “I choose not to be licensed so I don’t have the regulations”. I picked apart their supposed-insurance programs in front of them as they sweated and denigrated my meticulousness. I researched the effects their programs had on families in front of them and debunked their work to their face.
In this election we have a reality TV entertainer riling up anger and sowing hatred while an experienced politician with over 30 years of experience and service doggedly working for us. Neither candidate is perfect, for sure, though one is obviously far more flawed than the other.
Just as we wouldn’t want an unlicensed insurance agent protecting our family, we don’t want someone who makes money off of free press generated by controversy running our country.
We deserve the best, most qualified, steadiest candidate out there. That candidate is, by far, Hillary Clinton and I am proud to give her the endorsement of my company, the Bow Tie Financial Group.